|
Who missed the ballet?
"We've traveled as far as Russia, but never have we been received
so warmly and taken care of so well till now. Dumaguete has become
our favorite!" enthused prima ballerina Lisa Macuja-Elizalde of
Ballet Manila, after a standing ovation from an appreciative audience
at the Luce Auditorium last Saturday. It was a wonderful cultural
treat for Dumaguete. More international caliber artists should perform
in this intellectually sophisticated community. And everything would
have been perfect for the Ballet Manila show, except…
Some missed the whole point of culture, gentility and fine
manners. Instead, there was a sideshow of people being refused entry
because they were "improperly dressed". Meaning, they wore jeans,
or, in the case of Silliman students from the School of Basic Education,
khaki pants.
And so unfortunately, the talk about town was not on how good
the ballet was, but who got "bumped off" the show.
Many patrons, local and foreign, the young and elderly alike,
were disappointed, oftentimes embarrassed, for being refused admission
from the "biggest cultural event of the year" (actually, last year
-- if you consider the organizer's failure to deliver on its promise
the first time around).
A retired minister, a high school student, a lawyer's
teens, a journalist's son, a businesswoman's family, a businessman
from Bacolod, and many more interested patrons were victimized by
the so-called Luce dress code. Even a foreign visitor who went to
the Luce in very decent attire -- part of his outfit was a pair
of "dress" jeans -- was also turned away. Also, a prominent lawyer
went with his wife Friday night. He was in jeans, so he was sent
home. His wife, however, was allowed entry. Preferring to watch
the show together, he arranged to have their tickets changed for
the Saturday gala show. The following night, they thought everything
was going to be fine because the lawyer went in slacks, but guess
what? This time, his wife was not allowed to get in because like
jeans, corduroy was a no-no! Ironically, that was exactly the same
outfit she wore the night before, and was allowed in!
And what about a kid who was not allowed in because he was
dressed in an un-gala pair of khakis? Anyone would have gotten the
point, but some patrons were confused: Guess who were spotted seated
in VIP seats who were also dressed in "very un-gala" khakis?
What's not funny about this is how this double-standard played
out the whole weekend.
Although this is really nothing new at the Luce. There was a time
when the usherettes would "feel" with their fingers the clothing
of the patron to determine if it was acceptable for gala or not!
Or that embarrassing incident when a man was refused entry because
he was not in leather shoes -- but only in (nice leather) sandals
because he just had an operation on an ingrown toe nail! Or what
about usherettes scrambling to borrow leather shoes from patrons
who are already seated inside the Luce to lend to patrons outside
the Luce whom they had refused entry because they were not in leather
shoes. The preoccupation with dress codes diverted the focus of
the event -- which was simply to enjoy a good show. What's even
more ironic is that other cultural venues like the world-famous
Sydney Opera House, or the Broadway theaters in New York, or other
concert halls in Europe, or even our Cultural Center of the Philippines
in Roxas Blvd. would have found the attire of the "refused" patrons
perfectly acceptable. So what was the big deal all about?* (To be
continued)
back to top
|